Perturbational technique for co-optimizing design rules and illumination conditions for lithography process

ABSTRACT

A process of generating design rules, OPC rules and optimizing illumination source models for an integrated circuit layout, to form short lines, terminated lines and crossovers between adjacent parallel route tracks, may include the steps of generating a set of template structures which use a set of characteristic design rules, and performing a plurality of source mask optimization (SMO) operations on the set of template structures with different values for the design rules in each SMO operation. In a first embodiment, the SMO operations are run using a predetermined set of values for each of the design rules, spanning a desired range of design rule values. In a second embodiment, the SMO operations are performed in a conditional iterative process in which values of the design rules are adjusted after each iteration based on results of the iteration.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional PatentApplication Ser. No. 13/410,088, filed Mar. 1, 2012, and claims thebenefit of priority under U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application61/448,415 (Texas Instruments docket number TI-68867PS, filed Mar. 2,2011).

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of integrated circuits. Moreparticularly, this invention relates to processes for forming integratedcircuits.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Integrated circuits may be formed using photolithography processes withilluminations sources having wavelengths more than twice a desired pitchof metal interconnect lines in the integrated circuits. Attainingdesired tradeoffs between fabrication costs and fabrication yield may bedifficult. For example, technology nodes at and beyond the 28 nanometernode using 193 nanometer illumination sources may require more than onepattern step to obtain desired first metal interconnect layouts.Providing design rules, optical proximity correction (OPC) rules andoptimizing illumination source models to form short lines, terminatedlines and crossovers between adjacent parallel route tracks with desiredlateral dimensions may be problematic.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basicunderstanding of one or more aspects of the invention. This summary isnot an extensive overview of the invention, and is neither intended toidentify key or critical elements of the invention, nor to delineate thescope thereof. Rather, the primary purpose of the summary is to presentsome concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to amore detailed description that is presented later.

A process of generating design rules, OPC rules and optimizingillumination source models for an integrated circuit layout, to formshort lines, terminated lines and crossovers between adjacent parallelroute tracks, may include the steps of generating a set of templatestructures which use a set of characteristic design rules, andperforming a plurality of source mask optimization (SMO) operations onthe set of template structures with different values for the designrules in each SMO operation. In a first embodiment, the SMO operationsare run using a predetermined set of values for each of the designrules, spanning a desired range of design rule values. In a secondembodiment, the SMO operations are performed in a conditional iterativeprocess in which values of the design rules are adjusted after eachiteration based on results of the iteration.

DESCRIPTION OF THE VIEWS OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a non-iterative process of optimizing designrules, OPC rules and illumination source models according to the firstembodiment.

FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary initial illuminator model.

FIG. 3 is a top view of an interconnect layout which illustrate anexemplary set of design rules of interest.

FIG. 4 is an exemplary set template structures which use acharacteristic set of design rules.

FIG. 5 is a portion of a matrix of template structures.

FIG. 6 depicts a matrix generated according to the instant embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a flow chart of a conditional iterative process of optimizingdesign rules, OPC rules and illumination source models according to thesecond embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is described with reference to the attachedfigures, wherein like reference numerals are used throughout the figuresto designate similar or equivalent elements. The figures are not drawnto scale and they are provided merely to illustrate the invention.Several aspects of the invention are described below with reference toexample applications for illustration. It should be understood thatnumerous specific details, relationships, and methods are set forth toprovide an understanding of the invention. One skilled in the relevantart, however, will readily recognize that the invention can be practicedwithout one or more of the specific details or with other methods. Inother instances, well-known structures or operations are not shown indetail to avoid obscuring the invention. The present invention is notlimited by the illustrated ordering of acts or events, as some acts mayoccur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events.Furthermore, not all illustrated acts or events are required toimplement a methodology in accordance with the present invention.

A process of generating design rules, OPC rules and optimizingillumination source models for an integrated circuit layout, to formshort lines, terminated lines and crossovers between adjacent parallelroute tracks, may include the steps of generating a set of templatestructures which use a set of characteristic design rules, andperforming a plurality of SMO operations on the set of templatestructures with different values for the design rules in each SMOoperation. In a first embodiment, the SMO operations are run using apredetermined set of values for each of the design rules, spanning adesired range of design rule values. In a second embodiment, the SMOoperations are performed in a conditional iterative process in whichvalues of the design rules are adjusted after each iteration based onresults of the iteration.

FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a non-iterative process of generating designrules for an integrated circuit layout according to the firstembodiment. The non-iterative process 100 begins with step 102 togenerate an initial model for an illuminator for a photolithographicprocess to be used for forming integrated circuits. FIG. 2 depicts anexemplary initial illuminator model. The off-axis illumination sourcemodel 200 has a moderate dipole component. The emitting area isconfigured in two large dipole regions 202 along the vertical directionand smaller source regions 204 along the horizontal and diagonaldirections.

The non-iterative process 100 continues with step 104 to generate a setof characteristic design rules. The design rules may be, for example, aset of design rules which cover a desired fraction of layout featureencountered in an integrated circuit of interest. FIG. 3 is a top viewof an interconnect layout which illustrate an exemplary set of designrules of interest. Interconnects in FIG. 3 are depicted with a starhatch pattern. The layout 300 includes a line space feature 302 which islaid out using a line space design rule 304. The layout 300 includes ashort line feature 306 which is laid out using a short line design rule308. The layout 300 includes a crossover 310 with a crossover widthfeature 312 which is laid out using a crossover width design rule 314.The layout 300 includes a line-end to crossover feature 316 which islaid out using a line-end to crossover design rule 318. The layout 300includes a line-end to crossover corner feature 320 which is laid outusing a line-end to crossover corner design rule 322. The layout 300includes a crossover exclusion zone feature 324 which is laid out usinga crossover exclusion zone design rule 326.

The non-iterative process 100 continues with step 106 to generate a setof template structures which use the set of design rules generated instep 104. FIG. 4 is an exemplary set template structures which use acharacteristic set of design rules, for example the design rulesdescribed in reference to FIG. 3. Interconnects in FIG. 4 are depictedwith a star hatch pattern. A first template structure 400 may have, forexample, the line space feature 302 and the short line feature 306, andhence use the line space design rule 304 and the short line design rule308. A second template structure 402 may have, for example, thecrossover width feature 312 and the line-end to crossover corner feature320, and hence use the crossover width design rule 314 and the line-endto crossover corner design rule 322. A third template structure 404 mayhave, for example, the crossover width feature 312 and the line-end tocrossover corner feature 320 in a different configuration from thesecond template structure 402, and hence use the crossover width designrule 314 and the line-end to crossover corner design rule 322. A fourthtemplate structure 406 may have, for example, the crossover widthfeature 312 in a different configuration from the third templatestructure 404, and hence use the crossover width design rule 314. Afifth template structure 408 may have, for example, the crossover widthfeature 312, the line-end to crossover feature 316 and the line-end tocrossover corner feature 320, and hence use the crossover width designrule 314, the line-end to crossover design rule 318 and the line-end tocrossover corner design rule 322. A sixth template structure 410 mayhave, for example, the crossover width feature 312, the line-end tocrossover feature 316, the line-end to crossover corner feature 320 andthe crossover exclusion zone feature 324, and hence use the crossoverwidth design rule 314, the line-end to crossover design rule 318, theline-end to crossover corner design rule 322 and the crossover exclusionzone design rule 326. A seventh template structure 412 may have, forexample, the crossover width feature 312, the line-end to crossoverfeature 316 and the line-end to crossover corner feature 320 in adifferent configuration than the fifth template structure 408, and henceuse the crossover width design rule 314, the line-end to crossoverdesign rule 318 and the line-end to crossover corner design rule 322. Aneighth template structure 414 may have, for example, the crossover widthfeature 312, the line-end to crossover feature 316, the line-end tocrossover corner feature 320 and the crossover exclusion zone feature324 in a different configuration than the sixth template structure 410,and hence use the crossover width design rule 314, the line-end tocrossover design rule 318, the line-end to crossover corner design rule322 and the crossover exclusion zone design rule 326. A ninth templatestructure 416 may have, for example, the crossover width feature 312 andthe line-end to crossover feature 316 in a different configuration thanthe fifth template structure 408, and hence use the crossover widthdesign rule 314 and the line-end to crossover design rule 318. A tenthtemplate structure 418 may have, for example, the crossover widthfeature 312 in a different configuration than the ninth templatestructure 416, and hence use the crossover width design rule 314.

The non-iterative process 100 continues with step 108 to generate amatrix of the template structures from step 106 with a range of valuesfor the relevant design rules. FIG. 5 is a portion of a matrix, showinginstances of the first template structure 400 from FIG. 4 with a rangeof three values each for the line space design rule 304 and the shortline design rule 308. Interconnects in FIG. 5 are depicted with a starhatch pattern. A first instance 500 of the first template structure hasa first line space design rule value 502 and a first short line designrule value 504. A second instance 506 of the first template structurehas a second line space design rule value 508 and the same short linedesign rule value 504 as the first instance 500 of the first templatestructure. A third instance 510 of the first template structure has athird line space design rule value 512 and the same short line designrule value 504 as the first instance 500 of the first templatestructure.

A fourth instance 514 of the first template structure has the same linespace design rule value 502 as the first instance 500 of the firsttemplate structure and a second short line design rule value 516. Afifth instance 518 of the first template structure has the same linespace design rule value 508 as the second instance 506 of the firsttemplate structure and the same short line design rule value 516 as thefourth instance 514 of the first template structure. A sixth instance520 of the first template structure has the same line space design rulevalue 512 as the third instance 510 of the first template structure andthe same short line design rule value 516 as the fourth instance 514 ofthe first template structure.

A seventh instance 522 of the first template structure has the same linespace design rule value 502 as the first instance 500 of the firsttemplate structure and a third short line design rule value 524. Aneighth instance 526 of the first template structure has the same linespace design rule value 508 as the second instance 506 of the firsttemplate structure and the same short line design rule value 524 as theseventh instance 522 of the first template structure. A ninth instance528 of the first template structure has the same line space design rulevalue 512 as the third instance 510 of the first template structure andthe same short line design rule value 524 as the seventh instance 522 ofthe first template structure.

Similar design rule value ranges may be applied to the remainingtemplate structures 402 through 418 in the set of template structuresfrom step 104 to generate a first instance through a ninth instance ofeach template structure 402 through 418 to provide a complete matrix often template structures 400 through 418 times nine instances pertemplate structure in step 108. FIG. 6 depicts a matrix generatedaccording to the instant embodiment. The matrix 600 has nine rows 602through 618. Each matrix row 602 through 618 includes one instance ofeach of the template structures 400 through 418, with a different set ofdesign rule values in each row 602 through 618. Every instance of aparticular design rule has a same value in a given row. For example,every instance of the line-end to crossover corner design rule 322 inthe first row 602 has a first same value. Every instance of the line-endto crossover corner design rule 322 in the second row 604 has a secondsame value, which may be different from the first value. In the instantembodiment, the matrix 600 includes nine rows. The first templatestructure 500 of the first matrix row 602 is the first instance 500 ofthe first template structure having the first line space design rulevalue 502 and the first short line design rule value 504 as depicted inFIG. 5. The first template structure 506 of the second matrix row 604 isthe second instance 506 of the first template structure as depicted inFIG. 5, and similarly for the first template structure in each remainingmatrix row 608 through 618. It will be recognized that the matrix mayinclude more values of each design rules, so that the matrix includesmore than nine instances of each template structure.

The non-iterative process 100 continues with step 110 to perform SMOoperations on the matrix 600 generated in step 108. The SMO operationoptimizes all instances of the template structures in the matrix rows602 through 618 simultaneously. Each SMO operation starts with theinitial illuminator model generated in step 102. Specific steps of theSMO process may be found in the open literature, for example Rosenbluthet al., “Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape” inJournal of Microlithography, Microfabrication and Microsystems, Volume1, Issue 13 2002. A common illuminator model is optimized for allinstances of the template structures 400 through 418 in the matrix 600,so that step 110 provides a single common optimized illumination sourcemodel for all the matrix rows 602 through 618 and an optimized maskgeometry for each instance of the template structures 400 through 418for the instant design rule values, in the matrix 600.

Subsequently, step 112 is performed, in which a separate lithographyfigure of merit is estimated for each matrix row 602 through 618 forprinted patterns of the template structures printed using anillumination source based on the optimized illumination source model andoptimized mask geometries for that row provided by the SMO operation ofstep 110. The lithography figure of merit may include, for example, anycombination of parameters such as depth of focus (DOF), mask errorenhancement factor (MEEF), exposure latitude, critical dimension (CD)uniformity, and line end pullback. An estimation procedure for thefigure of merit may weight the parameters with different weight values,for example depending on an expected frequency of occurrence in theintegrated circuit. Step 112 also notes instances of features which areestimated to fail to print correctly, for example features of separatedlines for which photolithographic patterns are estimated to fail toseparate from each other, referred to as failing features. Instances offailing features reduce the lithography figure of merit for the instantrow containing the failing features.

Subsequently, step 114 is performed, in which a set of design rulevalues is selected from the results of the SMO operation of step 110corresponding to a desired value of the lithography figure of merit withno failing features, provided by step 112, and to use the selecteddesign rule values to fabricate the integrated circuit. The desiredvalue is selected from matrix rows 602 through 618 which do not have anyinstances of features which are estimated to fail to print correctly,and which may, for example, provide an estimated minimum area of theintegrated circuit. The selected set of design rule values may be usedto generate a mask layout for an integrated circuit and thecorresponding illumination source model may then be used to fabricatethe integrated circuit.

FIG. 7 is a flow chart of a conditional iterative process of generatingdesign rules for an integrated circuit layout according to the secondembodiment. The conditional iterative process 700 begins with step 702to generate an initial model for an illuminator for a photolithographicprocess to be used for forming integrated circuits, as described withrespect to step 102 in FIG. 1. The conditional iterative process 700continues with step 704 to generate a set of template structures whichuse a characteristic set of design rules, as described in reference tostep 104 of FIG. 1. The characteristic design rules may include, forexample, the design rules discussed in reference to FIG. 3.Subsequently, step 706 is performed in which a set of templatestructures is generated which use the set of design rules generated instep 704. The set of template structures may include, for example, thetemplate structures discussed in reference to FIG. 4.

The conditional iterative process 700 continues with step 708 togenerate initial values for the design rules selected in step 704. Theinitial design rule values may be, for example, similar to the valuesused in the first matrix row 602 as discussed in reference to FIG. 6.Other initial values for the design rules are within the scope of theinstant embodiment.

The conditional iterative process 700 continues with step 710 to performSMO operations on each instance of the template structures generated instep 706 starting with the design rule values generated in step 708. TheSMO operations are described in reference to step 110 of FIG. 1. Step710 provides a common optimized illumination source model for the set oftemplate structures, and an optimized mask geometry for each instance ofthe template structures of step 706 for the design rule values of step708.

After the SMO operations of step 710 are completed, step 712 isperformed in which a lithography figure of merit is estimated forprinted patterns of the set of template structures when printed using anillumination source based on the optimized illumination source model andoptimized mask geometries provided by the SMO operation of step 710. Thelithography of merit may be generated, for example, as discussed inreference to step 112 of FIG. 1.

After the lithography figure of merit is estimated in step 712, step 714is performed, which determines if the printed patterns of the set oftemplate structures have any failing features. If a FALSE condition isobtained, in which the printed patterns of the set of templatestructures do not have any failing features, step 716 is performed. If aTRUE condition is obtained, in which the printed patterns of the set oftemplate structures do have any failing features, step 718 is performed.

Step 716 is to adjust the values of the design rules used by thetemplate structures, so as to reduce the area of the integrated circuit.The adjustment may include, for example, incrementally relaxing rulesassociated with features of the template structures which degrade thelithography figure of merit, and incrementally tightening rulesassociated with features of the template structures which have somemargin with respect to the lithography figure of merit. After step 716is completed, the conditional iterative process 700 returns to step 710for another iteration of steps 710, 712 and 714.

Step 718 is to select the values of the design rules providing a desiredvalue of the lithography figure of merit corresponding to an iterationof the SMO operation which produced no failing features and to use theselected design rule values to fabricate the integrated circuit. Theselected set of design rule values and corresponding set of OPC rulesfrom the last iteration of step 710 with no failing features may be usedto generate a mask layout for an integrated circuit. The illuminationsource model from the same last iteration of step 710 with no failingfeatures may then be used to fabricate the integrated circuit.

While various embodiments of the present invention have been describedabove, it should be understood that they have been presented by way ofexample only and not limitation. Numerous changes to the disclosedembodiments can be made in accordance with the disclosure herein withoutdeparting from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the breadthand scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of theabove described embodiments. Rather, the scope of the invention shouldbe defined in accordance with the following claims and theirequivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A process of generating design rules for anintegrated circuit layout by a non-iterative process, comprising thesteps of: generating an initial model for an illuminator for aphotolithographic process; generating a set of characteristic designrules for layout features of said integrated circuit layout; generatinga set of template structures which use said set of design rules;generating a matrix of said template structures with a range of valuesfor said design rules, so that each row of said matrix includes oneinstance of each of said of said template structures, with a differentset of said values of said design rules in each said row; performing asource mask optimization (SMO) operation on each instance of saidtemplate structures in each of said matrix rows, starting with saidinitial model for said illuminator, in which said illuminator model isoptimized for all instances of said template structures in said matrix,so that said SMO operation provides a separate optimized mask geometryfor each instance of said template structures in each of said matrixrows; and estimating a lithography figure of merit for each said matrixrow, for printed patterns of said template structures when printed usingan illumination source based on said optimized illumination source modeland optimized mask geometries for said matrix row provided by said SMOoperation on said matrix row, and noting instances of failing featureswhich are estimated to fail to print correctly.
 2. The process of claim1, in which said step of estimating said lithography figure of meritincludes depth of focus (DOF) and mask error enhancement factor (MEEF).3. The process of claim 1, in which said step of estimating saidlithography figure of merit includes exposure latitude.
 4. The processof claim 1, in which said step of estimating said lithography figure ofmerit includes critical dimension (CD) uniformity, and line endpullback.
 5. The process of claim 1, in which an instance of saidtemplate structures includes a line space feature.
 6. The process ofclaim 1, in which an instance of said template structures includes ashort line feature.
 7. The process of claim 1, in which an instance ofsaid template structures includes a crossover width feature.
 8. Theprocess of claim 1, in which an instance of said template structuresincludes a line-end to crossover corner feature.
 9. The process of claim1, in which an instance of said template structures includes a line-endto crossover feature.
 10. The process of claim 1, in which an instanceof said template structures includes a crossover exclusion zone feature.